Pop-Culture | Posted by Bethan S on 02/29/2012

Yorkie: Not Just For The Blokie

The majority of us in the UK will remember the controversial 2002 campaign for the chunky, ‘King size, not Queen sized’ Yorkie chocolate bar. This campaign’s primary slogan stated daringly: ‘It’s Not For Girls’.

My younger brothers found the campaign a great novelty and drew amusement by purposefully eating the blue-wrapped bar with over-exaggerated pleasure while simultaneously boasting and proclaiming that because I was a girl, I wasn’t allowed to consume the chocolate. Be it petty child-like banter on display, it was clear that the story ran much deeper. Nestle (the company that makes the candy bar) pretty clearly implied through their slogans that women are inferior, if only to persuade males (in particular young male children) to purchase a chocolate bar.

The overall reaction to the campaign was mixed, but when representatives responsible for advertising the chocolate bar began handing out bars exclusively to men in Liverpool City Centre, it was (rightfully) seen as a discriminatory act. The representatives were banned by the council following a complaint from a female councillor, despite arguing that the campaign was meant to be ‘tongue-in-cheek’.

This incidence seems to beg the question as to where the line is drawn between a campaign that’s supposed to be humorous and an act that implies gender inferiority and inequality. Nestle’s decision for the campaign was based on the reasoning that in a current world of supposed growing female dominance, men didn’t have much that they could ‘claim as their own.’ So this chocolate bar was supposed to be gender-specific, which in turn brought the argument that it was repressive of the equality that women have worked hard for through the ages.

I bought a three bar Yorkie multipack recently, after a lengthy gap between my last purchase of the brand due to its sexist turn. On view, I realised that there were no signs of any sexism present. The ‘O’ — which I recollected as being depicted as a ‘no-go’ road sign with a female symbol within it (see image above) — had been replaced with a regular ‘O’ written in the same bright orange font as the rest of the word. The usually boldly emblazoned slogan had been removed on both the individual bars and the exterior multipack packaging. I issued a Google search and learned that there had been no comment by manufacturers regarding the changes in packaging designs or even the chocolate bars’ evidently shifted morals and ideology.

Therefore, it seems apparent that Nestle has changed their opinion regarding the standing of women in today’s chocolate-purchasing society and it seems that once more, women have been granted the approval to buy and consume Yorkie chocolate bars, without judgement, to their heart’s content! And thank God for that.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Rate this post




1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 4.50 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...






Read other posts about: , , , , , ,


Post Your Comment

  • Emma E @ at 8:22 pm, February 29th, 2012

    My mom is OBSESSED with Yorkie bars. When we lived in London, I was a lot younger, and one time I asked why it said ‘No girls allowed’ or something. She replied that it was most likely a marketing scheme to get women to buy it, thinking that they were defying sexism.

    I don’t know. Just thought I’d put that out there.

  • Gigi @ at 8:26 pm, February 29th, 2012

    The whole ‘it’s not for girls’ slogan always made me angry, because to be honest…well it just seems a tad unneccessary. Nestle suggesting they chose the gender specific slogan/product because men don’t have much to claim as their own (which actually, what the hell?) seems quite ridiculous. Were they planning to take back gender specific foodstuffs, one chocolate bar at a time? I’m not sure why a company selling chocolate bars would take it upon themselves to make such a (farcical) statement. Why they ever suggested the world is becomming female-dominated is beyond me.
    At least they finally made the decision to drop the dodgy sexist packaging. Even so, I won’t be buying any Yorkie bars in the near future.

  • Teresa @ at 1:07 pm, March 9th, 2012

    Has anyone heard of the new Dr. Pepper Ten?…”10 manly calories” and “it’s not for women.”

  • LevonTostig @ at 9:17 pm, March 10th, 2012

    BOLLOCKS! I took my daughters to buy a couple of Yorkies and we, too, saw that the no-girls O was replaced by a plain vagina, I mean vanilla, O. I’ve spent years teaching them there’s nothing they can’t have if they want it badly enough and work hard to earn it, and here these Nestle twits come along and LOWER the (chocolate) bar! Where’s the challenge? Where’s their chance to flip the big middle finger at their oppressors by munching on a Yorkie??? I’m at the end of my flippin’ tether with these touchy-feely nitwits.

  • Featured Bio: Julie Zeilinger | Now @ at 6:45 pm, November 2nd, 2014

    [...] on everything from rushing a sorority to why women belong in the military to the absurdity of gendered candy bars. It’s not her mother’s brand of feminism, to be sure, but the sassy tone and honest rapport [...]

Leave a Reply